• Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
    • Faculty
    • Current PhDs
    • Completed PhDs
    • Ongoing Projects
    • Completed Projects
    • Networks
    • Publications
    • Masters in Media, Power, and Public Affairs
    • PhD
    • Upcoming
    • Past
    • Stay Up To Date
    • Twitter
    • RHUL Politics & IR
    • Contact Us
    • Find Us
  • Search
Menu

newpolcom

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number

Your Custom Text Here

newpolcom

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Current PhDs
    • Completed PhDs
  • Research
    • Ongoing Projects
    • Completed Projects
    • Networks
    • Publications
  • Study
    • Masters in Media, Power, and Public Affairs
    • PhD
  • Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past
  • Connect
    • Stay Up To Date
    • Twitter
    • RHUL Politics & IR
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Find Us
  • Search

Strategic narrative panels at the International Studies Association (ISA) convention in Toronto this week

March 24, 2019 Administrator
Toronto (Wikimedia Commons)

Toronto (Wikimedia Commons)

For those at the ISA annual convention in Toronto on 27-31 March, there will be a number of panels exploring the role of strategic narrative in international affairs, including a debate about whether framing and narrative research can be unified in a productive way. Please find details below. There are also a range of other political communication-themed panels and talks, many of them convened by the International Communications (ICOMM) Section of ISA - find them on the official programme here.

TC13: Strategic Narratives, News Coverage, and Russia-U.S. Relations

Thursday, March 28, 1:45 PM - 3:30 PM Willow Centre, Sheraton Centre Toronto

Strategic Narratives, News Coverage, and Russia-U.S. Relations

  • Chair: Philip Seib (University of Southern California)

  • Participant: Alister Miskimmon (Queen's University, Belfast)

  • Participant: Ben O'Loughlin (Royal Holloway, University of London)

  • Participant: Laura Roselle (Elon University)

In their seminal work on strategic narratives, Miskimmon, O’Loughlin, and Roselle write, “Narratives are central to the identity and behavior of actors in the international system, the structures of the system itself, and how ideas, issues, and policies are contested.” Major powers, including Russia and the United States, rely heavily on strategic narratives to establish and maintain their influence within the arena of international relations. News media provide important venues for the communication of these narratives to global and domestic publics, and studying news coverage can provide insights about the construction and effectiveness of narratives. This roundtable will examine Russian and American strategic narratives as they are reflected in the two countries’ news media and will analyze ways that these narratives are affected by the evolution in media technologies and audience news consumption patterns.

FA24: Strategic Narratives and Frame Contestation: Unifying a Fractured Paradigm 

Friday, March 29, 8:15 AM - 10:00 AM Provincial South, Sheraton Centre Toronto

  • Chair: Steven L. Livingston (George Washington University)

  • Discussant: Carola Weil (McGill University, School of Continuing Studies)

Frames and Narratives: Conceptualizing Cultural Congruence

  • Author: Natalia Chaban (University of Canterbury)

Theorizing Narratives of Revolution in the Russian and Global Media Download the Paper

  • Author: Ben O'Loughlin (Royal Holloway, University of London)

RT Online Coverage of US Election 2016: Analyzing Strategic Narratives Related to Presidential Candidates Download the Paper

  • Author: Laura Roselle (Elon University)

Inverting Cascades: Network Framing Contestation Following Chemical Weapons Attacks in Syria

  • Author: Steven L. Livingston (George Washington University)

  • Author: Jack Nassetta (The George Washington University)

Framing in a Fractured Paradigm: Impacts of Digital Technology on Ideology, Power and International Affairs

  • Author: Robert Entman (George Washington University)

  • Author: Nikki Usher (University of Illinois)

Recent years have witnessed an explosion in the number of non-peer reviewed investigations of digital network “disinformation” campaigns and “fake news.” The political exigencies of the times have prioritized often richly empirical though atheoretical demonstrations of probable links between particular narratives and their sources (often Russian trolls and bots) and amplifiers (often state-sponsored media and extremist websites and social media users). In many instances, this work has been remarkably insightful and highly relevant to the urgent need to understand emergent threats to the integrity of Western Liberal institutions and norms. Missing from this work is the development of a political communication theory of “disinformation.” Such is the purpose of this panel. The papers presented here focus on the development of theoretical constructs that help us explain politically intentional global information flows. The papers are anchored by Entman’s cascade activation model of frame contestation (2005) and Miskimmon, Roselle, O’Loughlin (2013) strategic narratives framework. In this way, the panel coheres around a discrete intellectual challenge (theory building) and similar empirical research questions.

SA18: Stickiness and Silence: Explaining the Failures and Successes of Strategic Narrative

Saturday, March 30, 8:15 AM - 10:00 AM Chestnut East, Sheraton Centre Toronto

  • Chair: Alister Miskimmon (Queen's University, Belfast)

  • Discussant: Ben O'Loughlin (Royal Holloway, University of London)

The Belt and Road Initiative and Central Asia: A Success Story? Download the Paper

  • Author: Carolijn van Noort (University of the West of Scotland)

Narrative Stickiness or Narrative Resilience? Learning from the Clinton Administration’s Strategic Narratives and Varying Congruence in Multilateral Peace Operations Download the Paper

  • Author: Raphaël Zaffran (University of Geneva)

Trump’s Greatest Sticks: Covfefe, Witch Hunt, and Beyond. Narrative Stickiness, for Better or Worse, and Approaching the Formula for Narrative Success Download the Paper

  • Author: Devon Simons (Aberystwyth University)

Understanding How Citizens Narrate International Affairs - The Case of the UK Download the Paper

  • Author: Thomas Colley (King's College London)

Narrating Russia in Times of Information Warfare: How Sweden, France and the UK Mediate Response to Russian Disinformation Campaigns

  • Author: Maria Hellman (Swedish Defence University)

This panel seeks to describe and explain cases of strategic narrative success and failure. Why do some narrations of events stick for audiences while others fall silent? The panelists use a series of conflict-based case studies and theoretical approaches to discuss different measures and conceptualisation of success and failure, the conditions and temporalities of success and failure, and the ways in which success and failure exist independently of their narration of their own efficacy. This discussion builds directly on the Re-narrating Conflict: Media, Military and Public Translations of Strategic Narratives panel of ISA 2018. These panelists found surprising instances of narrative stickiness and silence: that UK audiences have forgotten 9/11 was related to the Afghanistan War; that elites in Kazakhstan tactically engage with the China’s Belt and Road strategic narratives to develop their own national identity narrative; that a hostile domestic press ignore Trump’s narrations yet with one curious exception; and that even when states achieve narrative congruence with multilateral allies there can be risk to clarity of mission. The new panel addresses a mix of old and new cases, making a distinct contribution to development forms of explanation and interpretation in the growing field of strategic narrative study.

← Why do we need investigative methods? Workshop 13th April 2019Welcome to Visiting Scholar Prof. Øyvind Kalnes →
Blog RSS

New Political Communication Unit, Royal Holloway, University of London.